Tuesday, September 22, 2026

Planet Earth's Harvest Squeeze: How Soaring Diesel Prices are Pushing Agriculture Worldwide into 'Survival Mode'

 

Da New Sees World Reportvia Daniyel @ Valero RefineryPort of Corpus Christi9/22, 2026


"You can't just say, 'Well, diesel is expensive, I'm not going to harvest.' You've just got to make it work in your budget."


As Farmers in the Northern Hemisphere enter the peak of the fall harvest season, an energy shock driven by military conflicts in Eastern Europe, as well as in the Middle East Iran is threatening the economic bedrock of our world's agricultural sector. With national diesel prices surging past record levels spanning the globe, including prices for diesel in the "oil rich" United States now ranging from $5.85 to over $6.50 per gallon; and much higher in California, operational costs for American growers have skyrocketed, forcing producers into what many industry insiders describe as full-fledged "survival mode". 

Unlike traditional manufacturers or logistics firms, agricultural family farmers are "price takers" on commodity markets. They cannot simply add a fuel surcharge to their crops when selling into global markets. This structural reality leaves farmers uniquely exposed to sudden energy spikes during critical operational windows. The Cost Mechanics of a Fuel Shock, and the financial toll on row-crop operations is immediate and severe. Fuel expenditures for corn production have risen by approximately $11 per acre, while soybean growers face an additional burden of roughly $7 per acre compared to last year.

Nationwide, American agricultural producers have absorbed an estimated $1.4 billion in additional diesel expenses over the past year alone. For a mid-sized operation, daily fuel bills during harvest can easily double. A Midwest grain farmer named Peterson noted that he expects to spend as much as $1,500 every day fueling just one combine harvester—double last year's expense. As Peterson explained, "You can't just say, 'Well, diesel is expensive, I'm not going to harvest.' You've just got to make it work in your budget." Because harvest timelines are strictly bound by weather and crop maturity, skipping or delaying field operations is impossible. The result is severe margin compression, pushing many family-run farms into deficit spending. Jon Paul Driver, Second Vice President at the Washington Farm Bureau, put the financial reality plainly: "Any increase in fuel right now is additional debt for the farm." Radical Adaptation on the Ground Faced with razor-thin margins and mounting liability, growers across key farming corridors are adopting extreme measures to curb daily cash outlays. In California’s Central Valley, vegetable farmer Wayne Gularte has resorted to pulling 1950s-era gasoline-powered tractors out of storage to replace newer diesel equipment, noting: "The only money we can make is the money we save." These drastic operational shifts reflect growing frustration across rural communities over the geopolitical root causes of the fuel spike. As one agricultural producer expressed regarding the conflict, "It's his war that caused this... and many farmers feel like we shouldn't be there." Supply Chain Friction and Food Inflation The shockwaves of elevated diesel prices extend far beyond the farm gate. Freight and refrigerated trucking rates along major agricultural corridors—particularly across California and the West Coast—have surged between 40% and 120%. Independent trucking operators, operating on slim capital reserves, face severe cash-flow strain from upfront diesel purchases, raising the prospect of widespread carrier insolvencies. Ultimately, these combined agricultural and transportation costs will travel downstream to food retailers and consumers. As David Ortega, an agricultural economist at Michigan State University, pointed out: "The majority of our food moves on trucks and those trucks use diesel." While cost adjustments take time to filter through long-term food supply chains, sustained energy inflation inevitably translates to higher grocery bills. With energy, transport, and storage accounting for over 7% of total retail food costs, consumers should expect persistent upward pressure on perishable goods, adding further economic headwinds for American households.

What Did Netanyahu Know Beforehand About Oct 7th? What Delayed IDF Response Time Against Hamas?

 


Da New Sees World Reportvia Daniyel enCorpus Christi9/22, 2026


In the episode titled "Were IDF Soldiers Told To Stand Down During the October 7th Attack from Hamas?" from his investigative series Reckoning: Israel and Gaza, Ben Swann investigates why the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) took hours to respond to the Hamas attacks on October 7, arguing that the delayed deployment and witness accounts point toward a potential military stand-down.

Below is a sequential analysis of the key points, arguments, and quotes presented throughout the video:


 Introduction: The Uncomfortable Question of the Israeli Military's Delayed Response


  • Key Point: Swann notes that despite Israel's small geographic size—being only slightly larger than New Jersey—the military and rescue response times across attacked kibbutzim and festival grounds ranged from 4 hours to over 20 hours. He highlights reports that thousands of soldiers were stationed under 40 minutes away from target sites.

  • Swann's Core Question:

    "During the October 7th attacks what did the Israeli military do? Well, strangely enough, for hours, nothing."

2. Case Study: The Delayed Rescue at Kibbutz Be'eri

  • Key Point: Militants breached Kibbutz Be'eri around 6:00 a.m.. Swann cites Israeli media helicopter footage and survivor testimonies showing hundreds of armed soldiers with armored vehicles stationed outside the gates hours before entering.

  • Key Details:

    • Around 500 soldiers gathered outside Be'eri by 4:30 p.m. (10.5 hours after the siege began).

    • Actual rescue efforts did not begin until nearly 7:00 p.m. (13 hours after the initial attack).

  • Witness Quote (Survivor Atal to Haaretz):

    "500 soldiers stood outside with equipment and vehicles. I remember yelling at them, 'We're being slaughtered, come in, save us.' And no one said anything."

3. Case Study: The Nova Music Festival Response

  • Key Point: Swann refers to prior reporting showing that the festival was approved at the last minute despite warning signs, and two military brigades had been relocated from the Gaza border to the West Bank shortly beforehand.

  • Key Details:

    • At 7:00 a.m., the organizer called the officer in charge of approving the permit, Lt. Col. Elad Zandani, reporting active gunfire on partygoers; he reportedly told them to "fend for themselves."

    • First IDF units did not arrive at the festival site until 3:00 p.m.—an 8-hour gap for an elite military force whose Gaza division headquarters was only a few miles away.

4. Contrast: Retaliatory Air Strikes vs. Domestic Defense

  • Key Point: By 10:46 a.m. (under four hours into the assault), the Israeli military had already launched offensive airstrikes targeting sites inside Gaza.

  • Swann's Argument:

    "If Israel could begin an offensive attack into Gaza within 4 hours, why did it take more than six hours, in most cases more than 10 hours, and in some cases 20 hours to mobilize inside their own country to stop the ongoing attack to defend the lives of their own people?"

5. Testimony of Stand-Down Orders (Jonathan Pollard)

  • Key Point: Swann cites remarks from former naval intelligence analyst Jonathan Pollard, who claimed personal knowledge of Israeli attack pilots being grounded during the crucial opening hours.

  • Quote (Jonathan Pollard):

    "I have friends who were attack helicopter pilots who were sitting in their cockpits ready to take off, fully loaded, ready to stop them at the fence. They didn't get their orders for 6 hours. They could hear the fighting, they were called by friends in the border kibbutzim and moshavim that were being overrun and slaughtered saying, 'Help us please, they're killing our children.' They weren't given permission to take off."

6. Reservist Accounts: Empty Highways

  • Key Point: Swann cites an account from reservist Ben Zaken, whose unit self-mobilized from central Israel toward the south around 1:30 p.m. without waiting for formal deployment orders.

  • Key Observation:

    • Expecting highway corridors packed with military convoys heading south, Zaken observed that the main roads were completely empty seven hours into the assault, leading him to ask: "Where's the IDF?"

7. Synthesized Timeline and Broader Conclusions

  • Timeline Summary Presented by Swann:

    • 6:00 a.m.: Hamas rocket barrage and border breaches begin.

    • 10:00 a.m.: Israeli Defense Minister publicly announces the country is at war.

    • 10:30 a.m. – 10:46 a.m.: Strikes on targets inside Gaza commence.

    • 4 to 10+ hours later: Ground units arrive outside affected communities, often waiting additional hours before engaging.

  • Closing Argument: Swann asserts that the combination of unheeded advance warnings, warnings dismissed under threat of disciplinary action, troop redeployments before the event, and long delays in deploying ready units suggests an implicit or explicit stand-down. He concludes by questioning proposed legislation criminalizing challenges to the state's official October 7 narrative with penalties up to five years in prison.