Bibi's Blowback Bombshell: Israeli Press Reveal Netanyahu had Foreknowledge of October 7th Hamas Attack

This full-length interview provides firsthand context and operational analysis from former IDF Special Forces Officer Dr. Yair Ansbacher regarding Israel's national security strategies and the events surrounding October 7th.

Da New Sees World Reportvia Daniyel enCorpus Christi9/21, 2026

"Therefore whatever you have spoken in the dark will be heard in the light, and what you have spoken in the ear in inner rooms will be proclaimed on the rooftops" 

Luke 12:3

In geopolititical statecraft, the most dangerous failures rarely stem from an absolute vacuum of intelligence. More often, they happen when clear, unambiguous alerts run headlong into an entrenched Head of State, and his Inner Circle of advisors who simply refuses to hear them.

For months following the disaster of October 7, 2023, the prevailing defense from Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s Office in Jerusalem followed a convenient script: the military intelligence apparatus failed, and the political leadership was left in the dark. Yet as recent investigative reports released by Haaretz, and frontline testimonis have emerged, that defense has collapsed.

The catastrophic security collapse along the Gaza border was not a sudden operational bolt from the blue. It was the predictable collision of a broken political doctrine, willful blindness to frontline intelligence, and the active dismissal of direct warnings from Israel’s own Arab security partners.

The Warnings That Were Waved Away: MBZ & Cairo

The most damning rebuttal to the official narrative lies in investigative reporting published by Haaretz, detailing how foreign leaders attempted to break through Israel’s conceptual paralysis just days before the assault.

Roughly ten days before the attack, United Arab Emirates President Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan (MBZ) held an urgent, secure 45-minute exchange with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The Emirati leader provided an explicit, high-level alert: Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar had shifted away from routine administrative posturing and was actively preparing an unprecedented, offensive invasion into Israeli sovereign territory.

Simultaneously, a high-ranking Egyptian military intelligence official—working through Cairo’s direct, decades-old security channels with Jerusalem—personally warned Israeli counterparts that a "terrifying operation" was brewing inside Gaza. The Egyptians flagged that the border was primed to explode in a manner fundamentally different from past rounds of rocket fire.

Yet these warnings were brushed aside. Trapped in a consensus that treated regional security as a closed, solved problem, the political echelon concluded that Hamas was deterred and lacked the appetite for an existential confrontation. The alerts were classified as routine Arab anxiety, and border deployments remained dangerously thin.

 Likud's Doctrine: Keep Palestine Divided, No Two State Solution, Buying Quiet

To understand how explicit diplomatic alerts from Arab heads of state could be discarded, one must understand the core policy Benjamin Netanyahu pursued for over a decade: preserving Hamas as a counterweight to the Palestinian Authority.

The geopolitical calculus was cynical and deliberate. By ensuring that Gaza remained under the iron rule of an internationally isolated militant organization while the Western-backed Palestinian Authority governed parts of the West Bank, Palestinian national leadership remained permanently fractured. As long as Palestinians were split between two rival factions, Israel’s leadership could argue there was no credible, unified partner with whom to negotiate a sovereign Palestinian state.

To sustain this equilibrium, the Israeli government institutionalized what defense officials termed "buying quiet." Run directly through Israel’s National Security Council (Malal), roughly $15 million in cash, flown in from Qatar, was permitted each month through Israeli crossings into Gaza.

The political theory was simple: Hamas could be paid to stay docile. High-level planners operated under the delusion that once Hamas took administrative power, it had transformed from an insurgent militia into a municipal bureaucracy bogged down by civil service payrolls, public services, and infrastructure upkeep. Around IDF headquarters, the doctrine was distilled into a single operational assumption: quiet is worth everything. Every suitcase of cash was treated as purchasing another thirty days of calm.

It was a fatal miscalculation. While Jerusalem treated the arrangement as an economic leash, Hamas treated it as operational shelter. Sinwar used the cash, the economic breathing room, and the diplomatic distraction to build an underground offensive fortress right under Israel's border.

The Blind Spot: Mirror Imaging and Institutional Contempt

The failure was rooted in "mirror imaging"—the cognitive error of projecting one's own values and calculations onto an adversary.

Israeli political and intelligence elites evaluated Hamas through a Western, utilitarian lens. They believed work permits, cross-border trade, and reconstruction concrete would satisfy the group's leadership. They failed to grasp that they were facing an ideological, religious adversary for whom material wealth and civilian welfare were secondary to an overarching doctrine of armed confrontation.

Because decision-makers were locked inside this conceptual bubble (known inside Israel as The Conceptzia), contradictory evidence was treated as noise:

• The Frontline Spotters: 
  
  
• Along the border fence, young female surveillance soldiers (tatzpitaniyot) spent weeks sounding the alarm. They documented Hamas commandos practicing how to breach perimeter barriers, destroy observation masts with explosive commercial drones, and assault replica Israeli kibbutzim. Higher military ranks dismissed their reports as meaningless posturing.
• 
  
• Internal Security Escalation: 
  
  
• Internal security directors warned that the country was drifting toward a major confrontation along the southern axis.
• 
  
• The Domestic Diversion:
  
  
• Consumed by a ferocious domestic battle over judicial reforms that triggered widespread protests and split the military's reserve readiness, the government prioritized political survival over basic defense upkeep. Gaza was filed away as a contained theater.
• 
  

Conspiracy Theories vs. The Reality of the Iranian Plan:

In the wake of the disaster, online spheres latched onto claims that October 7 was an inside job—a "false flag" staged by Israeli intelligence to justify a devastating war.

These theories fall apart under forensic and operational scrutiny. The collapse of the southern frontier did not require a coordinated conspiracy; it was produced entirely by institutional hubris, systemic complacency, understaffed border divisions, and ignored warnings.

Attributing the breach to an Israeli plot also erases the operational agency of the adversary. As military analysts recognize, the raid was born of a broader Iranian strategic doctrine: a synchronized, multi-front offensive designed to overwhelm Israel from both Gaza and Lebanon at once, paralyzing the military with tens of thousands of rockets while ground forces struck the Galilee and the south.

The turning point occurred within Hamas itself. Driven by personal ambition to establish himself as the sole champion of the Palestinian cause, Yahya Sinwar launched the attack independently. His decision caught Israel unprepared, but it also disrupted Iran's coordinated, regional master plan.

The Strategic Vacuum:

The tragedy did not end on the morning of October 7; it metastasized in the campaign that followed.

Instead of matching military force to a viable diplomatic day-after framework, the leadership operated in a strategic vacuum. Even after early, leaked intelligence papers floated plans to permanently displace Gaza's population into Egypt's Sinai desert, the political echelon produced no realistic post-war governance structure.

The military campaign descended into widespread destruction, humanitarian collapse, and repetitive tactical operations that failed to dismantle the underlying political knot. Today, with the government facing international legal isolation and war crimes warrants at the ICC, Israel finds itself more strategically vulnerable on the global stage than at any point in its modern history.

The Takeaway: 

Geopolitical history rarely deals gently with leaders who fall in love with their own schemes.

October 7 is an enduring lesson in the limits of transactional statecraft: 

You cannot neutralize a committed ideological adversary with cash, you cannot maintain national security while dismissing your own frontline scouts, and you cannot afford to wave away explicit alerts from regional allies who understand the neighborhood far better than you do. When a nation's leadership decides that managing a crisis is easier than confronting reality, catastrophe is never a question of if—only of when.

Bombshell Video: IDF Special Forces Officer: Something Very Strange Happened on Oct. 7th

In a bombshell interview between Podcaster Yishai Fleischer; the International Spokesperson for the Jewish Community in Hebron, and former IDF Special Forces Commando, and Israeli military strategical advisor Dr. Yair Ansbacher; Dr. Ansbacher revealed key details of how the Israeli government under Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu facilitated the monthly transfer of Qatari cash, ranging from between $15 Million to $30M per month. With an estimated Palestinian rocket barrage into the State of Israel on the morning of October 7th what could possibly have gone wrong, with the Likudniks' Master Grand Strategy?

Dr. Ansbacher’s Explanation of the Qatari Cash Transfers, The Core Architecture: "The Qatari Idea"

Ansbacher explains that the cash transfers were neither an accident nor an operation run in secret behind Israel's back. Instead, they were a deliberate, high-level policy spearheaded directly by Israel’s National Security Council (Malal), which reports directly to the Prime Minister:

• Key Figures Involved: 
  
  
• Ansbacher explicitly points to Benjamin Netanyahu alongside senior security heads such as former National Security Advisor Meir Ben-Shabbat and former Mossad Chief Yossi Cohen as the architects who conceptualized and maintained the channel with Qatar 
• 
  
• The Mechanics: 
  
  
• Rather than being smuggled, approximately $15 million in physical cash was routinely transported each month from Qatar directly through Israeli territory and Israeli-controlled border crossings into the hands of Hamas in Gaza 
• 
  

 The Doctrine of "Buying Quiet" (Sheket Ta'asiyati)

Ansbacher characterizes this policy as essentially paying "national protection money" to preserve domestic economic prosperity:

• The Imaginary Kirya Sign: Ansbacher notes that at IDF Headquarters (The Kirya), leadership operated under an unwritten rule: "Quiet is worth everything" 
  
  
• Buying Time: The government believed that economic stability and national GDP growth required absolute calm along the Gaza envelope. To Israeli planners, sending suitcases of cash was considered "worth every dime" because each payment was seen as purchasing another 30 days of quiet 
  
  
• The "Nation-Building" Illusion:
  
  
• Ansbacher argues that Israeli intelligence and political leadership fell into the trap of believing that after Hamas violently ousted the Palestinian Authority from Gaza in 2007, they had transitioned from an insurgent militia into a governing bureaucracy burdened by municipal administration, public payrolls, and civilian needs The Israeli leadership convinced themselves that if Qatar footed the bill for salaries and civil services, Hamas would remain content, economically incentivized, and deterred from war 
• 
  

Strategic Blindness: Paying an Enemy Sworn to Your Destruction

Ansbacher frames the entire setup as a catastrophic failure of basic strategic and ideological understanding:

• Funding the Dragon:
  
  
• By treating Hamas like standard Western economic actors who prioritize material prosperity, Israel actively funded an organization whose fundamental doctrine, school curricula, and culture are explicitly oriented around the destruction of the Jewish state 
• 
  
• Financing the Buildup: 
  
  
• While Israeli officials claimed the cash was maintaining "working quiet," Hamas used the calm, the relief from civil administrative costs, and the influx of capital to construct hundreds of miles of underground tunnels and amass arsenals just hundreds of meters from Israeli border communities 
• 
  

    Da Key Quotes on the Qatari Transfers

• On the Monthly Transfer Mechanism:
  
  

  "$15 million was transferred in cash from Qatar through Israelis to Hamas... for many years with the consent of Netanyahu. It’s not secretly. It’s what the idea of the Malal [National Security Council]—the idea is they created a relationship with Qatar."

  
  

  — Yair Ansbacher & Yishai Fleisher 

  
  

• On Israel Paying "Protection Money":
  
  

  "It’s not money. It’s quiet. You’re buying quiet... national protection. And when you’re asking the people in the IDF or in the intelligence corps, they will say: 'What do you want? It’s worth every dime because it’s another month of quiet.'"

  
  

   Yair Ansbacher 

  
  

• On the Madness of the Policy:
  
  

  "If it sounds crazy to pay someone who is saying, declaring, living in a mindset, teaching his kids, and having a whole culture of destroying the Israeli nation and the Jewish people around the world—to pay him—if it sounds crazy, let’s stop for a moment and think what were we doing."

  
  

   Yair Ansbacher

  Da Key Analysis: 

• With an Election date on October 27th for the Israeli government;  If Benjamin Netanyahu survives this election cycle, still in power, Eye would not expect any of these recent revelations to result in his removal from office. As he has publicly boasted for decades about his control over American politicians, we must understand that will say, and do anything to remain a free man. 

• Key Israeli Elements Involved in the scheme to fund Hamas via Qatari Cash: 

•  *Prime Minister's Office & Security Cabinet:  Netanyahu and his security cabinet formally authorized the framework to allow Qatari funds into Gaza 

•   * COGAT (Coordinator of Government Activities in the Territories): The IDF unit responsible for civilian policy in the Palestinian territories coordinated logistics, approving Qatari envoys (such as Mohammed al-Emadi) to transport cash directly through Israeli-controlled border crossings into Gaza. 

•  * Mossad & Shin Bet: Intelligence agencies assisted in negotiating the arrangement, vetting lists of recipient families, and maintaining security channels with Qatari officials. 

• Timeline:  * 2012-2018: Qatari aid to Gaza was delivered periodically through bank transfers and reconstruction projects. 

• * 2018-October 2023: The specific monthly cash-in-suitcases framework ($15M to $30M per month) was officially approved by Israel in 2018 and operated continually for 5 years until it was halted immediately following the October 7, 2023 attacks.  Stated and Strategic Purposes 

•  * Humanitarian Stabilization (stated Goal0: To prevent an economic collapse and humanitarian crisis in Gaza by directly funding fuel for power generation, paying civil servant salaries, and providing stipends to impoverished families.

•  *Political Separation (Strategic Rationale) : Netanyahu explicitly used the arrangement to keep Hamas functional as the governing authority in Gaza while keeping the Palestinian Authority (PA) restricted to the Occupied Territories of the West Bank. By maintaining this internal political division, the Israeli government waimed to weaken the PA and forestall international pressure for a unified Palestinian state or peace negotiations.

•    Likelihood of Funds Used for Rockets and Munitions 

•  * Financial Fungibility: While Qatari envoys transferred cash earmarked for civilian welfare and fuel, money in a closed economy is fungible. By having Qatar cover hundreds of millions of dollars in civil governance expenses, Hamas was able to redirect its own internal tax revenue, customs fees, and covert funding toward its military wing (Iss ad-Din al-Qassam Brigades). 

• * Diversion Mechanisms: Former Israeli intelligence officials, including former Mossad economic warfare chief Udi Levy, noted that physical cash delivered inside Gaza was nearly impossible to fully audit once distributed, allowing Hamas to collect taxes, skim portions, or substitute official funds. 

•  * Da Key Assessment: While direct Qatari physical cash may not have been handed directly to arms dealers, security analysts and elements of Israeli intelligence agree that these cash flows indirectly funded Hamas's military buildup by subsidizing the regime, allowing Hamas to allocate massive resources to subterranean tunnel construction, rocket manufacturing, and preparations for the October 7th attack on the state of Israel. 

• Are You Ready Fore Da End Zone Days?

• The prophecies of Amos Chapters One and Two operate on the biblical principle of dual fulfillment: While their immediate fulfillment addressed historical events between the 8th and 6th centuries BCE, during and relatively soon after the lifetime of the Shepherd from Tekoa. Yet more Dan Juan Bible Prophecy Scholars contend that their ultimate fulfillment of Da End Zone Days may just be beginning to arrive. Amos foretold that the judgment of all nations shall happen on "The Day of the LORD" (Yom Yah Who Awe) * Latter-Day Prophetic Themes in Amos Chapters 1 & 2:   * The LORD Roaring from Zion  The vivid imagery of our Messiah Yeshua's (Jesus of Nazareth) Return to the Heavenly City of the New Jerusalem foretells our Savior's uttering his exceedingly loud voice whenever he is speaking to large gatherings of his faithful servants, or as knead bee when he declares his righteous judgment over individuals, or entire nations upon Mount Zion in the City of David. Joel 3:16 & Revelation 19:1-15   * Judgment of the nations immediately surrounding the Holy Land of Yisrael. Amos delivers a profound series of oracles against six nations in Chapters one and two:  * Damascus (Syria) * Gaza as well as Ashdod and Ashkelon modern day cities along coastal southern Israel. * Tyre (Lebanon) * Edom, Moab, and Ammon (Modern Jordan)  Geographically, these ancient cities form the precise ring of hostile neighbors surrounding modern Israel.  Are these Pre-Millennial, and Latter Day prophecies frameworks for a Final Regional Showdown.  Prophecies such as Psalm 83, Ezekiel 38-39, and Zechariah 12 through 14 foretell of a band of nations coming against Israel in the End Times, only to face the wrath of "Da Lion of Da Tribe of Yahudah", (Judah)  * Amos 1-6-8 highlights Gaza's transgression of taking "whole communities captive, to deliver them up" Latter Day Prophecy Scholars point to the events of October 7, 2023; specifically the taking of hundreds of Israeli civilians as hostages from southern Israeli Kibbutzim, as well as countless young adult partakers at the Nova Music Festival into forced captivity, foreshadowed a profound ancient pattern's fulfillment of the judgment of the Israeli military in our own times: "I will send a fire upon the wall of Gaza, which shall devour its Palaces" foretold long ago about the exceedingly decisive retribution of the IDF and IAF against all of the citizens of Gaza, and the Coastal regions of southern Israel, before the return of Messiah Yeshua to our world.  * Ultimate Restoration after Judgment Day foretold in the Book of Amos:  The severe judgments against Judah and Israel in Amos 2:4-16 establish that Israel itself shall undergo profound trials and tribulations as Yah Who Way refines his people.       

• 
  
  The severe judgments against Judah and Israel in Amos 2:4–16 establish that Israel itself undergoes intense trials and refining. However, the complete prophetic arc of Amos concludes in Chapter 9 (Amos 9:11–15), which remains unfulfilled in its fullest sense:
   * The rebuilding of the fallen "tabernacle of David."
   * The permanent planting of Israel in their land, where they shall "no longer be pulled up out of the land" given to them.
  Because Israel was exiled historically in 722 BCE and 586 BCE, and scattered again in 70 CE, the permanent security described at the end of Amos is tied directly to the Latter-Day Kingdom of God.
  Setting the Stage for End-Time Fulfillment Since October 7, 2023
  The ongoing conflict in Israel and Gaza aligns with several key prerequisites for End-Time biblical scenarios:
   * Convergence Along Ancient Prophetic Borders: The simultaneous multi-front friction involving Gaza, Hezbollah in Lebanon (Tyre), proxy forces in Syria (Damascus), and regional militias mirrors the exact geographical perimeter condemned in Amos 1–2.
   * Heightened Pressure for a Global Peace Covenant: The global instability, humanitarian crises, and risk of wider warfare generated by the Gaza conflict intensify international demand for a comprehensive Middle Eastern security treaty. Eschatological frameworks identify such a covenant (as described in Daniel 9:27) as the definitive trigger for the final Tribulation period. * Alignment for the Ezekiel 38 Coalition:  The geographical realignments triggered by the conflict-drawing larger northern and eastern powers into opposition against Israel-set the political conditions for the broader multinational alliance foretold to gather against the mountains of Israel in the Latter Days.